Topic summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marxism results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 787 hits. Analysis detected 7,746 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,657 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,968 of 16,562 topics). This Marxism is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Marxism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,657
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos