Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martial Law Declaration results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 48.5% saturation with 980 hits. Analysis detected 4,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,022 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,976 of 16,562 topics). This Martial Law Declaration is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
Martial Law Declaration
Topic details
Total words: 2,022
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510088.1% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 48.5%48.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.8%19.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.3%25.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.7%21.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.8%5.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 48.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.6%Special Pleading: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos