Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 55 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Market Volatility results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 199 hits . Analysis detected 1,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 812 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,777 of 16,562 topics). This Market Volatility is worse (more manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group. Market Volatility
Topic details
Total words: 812
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.3% percentile 8.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles812 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 15.8% 15.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.8% 18.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 20.4% 20.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 17.7% 17.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 24.5% 24.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 15.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst