Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos57 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Market Competition results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 811 hits. Analysis detected 6,971 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (12,990 of 16,406 topics). This Market Competition is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Market Competition
Topic details
Total words: 9,720
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.8% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.6%7.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos