Topic summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos2,048 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marine Ecosystems results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 535 hits. Analysis detected 5,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,144 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (9,790 of 15,753 topics). This Marine Ecosystems is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Marine Ecosystems
Topic details
Total words: 6,144
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos