Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Holthaus results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 514 hits. Analysis detected 4,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,463 of 6,628 authors). This Eric Holthaus is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Eric Holthaus
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
63%Eric Holthaus (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,560
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510062.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos