Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mariachi Performance results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 62% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 498 faulty-reasoning hits from 192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (187 of 16,562 topics). This Mariachi Performance is worse (more manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Mariachi Performance
Topic details
Total words: 192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510098.9% percentile
21.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles192 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 62.0%62.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 34.4%34.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 31.3%31.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 25.0%25.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 16.7%16.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 19.3%19.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 14.1%14.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 25.0%25.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.3%8.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 62.0%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 34.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 31.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 6.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos