Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 290 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maga Politics results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 214 hits . Analysis detected 1,124 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,160 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 75% (4,175 of 16,562 topics). This Maga Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Maga Politics
Topic details
Total words: 1,160
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.8% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst