Topic summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video512 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Machine Learning Security results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 298 hits. Analysis detected 2,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (3,459 of 16,562 topics). This Machine Learning Security is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Machine Learning Security
Topic details
Total words: 1,536
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.1% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.2%16.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos