Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Food Guide results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 1,209 hits. Analysis detected 8,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,704 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,130 of 16,562 topics). This Los Angeles Food Guide is worse (more manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Los Angeles Food Guide
Topic details
Total words: 3,704
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.1% percentile
7.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 30.1%30.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 24.1%24.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 15.5%15.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 23.6%23.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 32.6%32.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.0%13.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 32.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%No True Scotsman: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.1%Straw Man: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos