Topic summary
⁠34%3 analyzed articles/videos1,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Angels results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, In-Group Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 716 hits. Analysis detected 4,199 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,293 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,486 of 16,558 topics). This Los Angeles Angels is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group.
Los Angeles Angels
Topic details
Total words: 5,293
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos