Fox News88%

A's pitcher JT Ginn loses no-hitter in 9th, Angels hit walk-off home run 28%

By Ryan Gaydos0%

5/19/2026, 9:53:31 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 398 faulty-reasoning hits from 424 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,441 of 21,218 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the article peer group.

Athletics pitcher J.T. 
Ginn was on the brink of making history on Monday night, but the moment fell out of his grasp in the final inning of the game against the Los Angeles Angels. 
Ginn took a no-hitter into the ninth inning, hoping to become the first pitcher to throw one by himself since Blake Snell did it for the San Francisco Giants on Aug. 2, 2024, and the first to complete one since three Chicago Cubs pitchers combined for one on Sept. 
4, 2024. 
The Angels were able to break up the no-no in the bottom of the ninth when Adam Frazier singled. 
Then, Zach Neto came to the plate and hit a walk-off home run, giving the Angels a 2-1 lead in dramatic fashion. 
In almost an instant, Ginn’s shot was ruined. 
"Obviously a tough game," Ginn said after the game. 
"Just keep your head up and keep moving forward. 
It’s just the nature of the game that we play. 
I attack the zone and I live with that." 
Frazier lined a pitch over the shortstop facing an 0-2 count. 
Neto was up 2-0 in the count when he hit the game-winning home run. 
"Just a crazy game to play," Ginn said. 
"I fell behind 2-0, threw a good sinker, and he was waiting on it and put a good swing on it. 
So, tip your cap to him." 
Ginn threw a career-high 105 pitches and struck out 10 batters. 
He became the sixth major leaguer since 1974 to allow no hits or runs in the first eight innings of the game and take the loss. 
Rich Hill last made the mark for the Los Angeles Dodgers in August 2017. 
"J.T. dominated all night. 
For him to walk off the mound with a loss there, it hurts, obviously," Athletics manager Mark Kotsay said. 
"He pitched probably the best game he’s pitched in his big league career, and to have an opportunity to get a no-hitter, and two hits later you walk off with a loss, it’s tough. 
I had full confidence in him going out there in that inning at 100 pitches and trying to get it done. 
It just didn’t work out." 
The A’s scored their lone run in the top of the ninth when Lawrence Butler drove in Zack Gelof. 
The A’s were able to record seven hits off the Angels. 
Los Angeles hasn’t been no-hit since Sept. 
11, 1999. 
The Associated Press contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.6%Ryan Gaydos: 2.5%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic11.6%This article: 6.1%Ryan Gaydos: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.1%This article: 15.3%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias15.3%This article: 5.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias5.0%This article: 8.3%Ryan Gaydos: 7.3%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect8.3%This article: 1.9%Ryan Gaydos: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion1.9%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Ryan Gaydos: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Ryan Gaydos: 11.0%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias10.8%This article: 7.1%Ryan Gaydos: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias7.1%This article: 1.2%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.2%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.3%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Ryan Gaydos: 2.5%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.3%Ryan Gaydos: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.1%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 3.7%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 5.2%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 7.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 2.4%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature2.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 14.4%Ryan Gaydos: 4.5%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice14.4%This article: 3.5%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination3.5%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

424 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers38%attributed speech262writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageJinn • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJinn • 9 words • 100.0% coverageJinn • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJinn • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJinn • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJinn • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJinn • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMark Kotsay • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMark Kotsay • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMark Kotsay • 34 words • 0.0% coverageMark Kotsay • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMark Kotsay • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mark Kotsay

100%flagged-word coverage
83 attributed words51% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-23.3 ptsWriter: 23.3%Mark Kotsay: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.