Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos424 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oakland Athletics results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Recency Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 352 hits. Analysis detected 2,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,748 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,246 of 37,536 keywords). This Oakland Athletics is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
Oakland Athletics
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
9%Oakland Athletics (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,748
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

9% percentile
02550751008.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos