Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video424 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oakland Athletics results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Recency Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 687 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,228 of 16,558 topics). This Oakland Athletics is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Oakland Athletics
Topic details
Total words: 1,696
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos