Topic summary
⁠82%3 analyzed articles/videos3,920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Restaurants results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 2,790 hits. Analysis detected 12,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,052 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (9,777 of 15,785 topics). This Local Restaurants is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Local Restaurants
Topic details
Total words: 14,052
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.9%19.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos