Author summary
82% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tommy Felts results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , In-Group Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 1,736 hits . Analysis detected 8,260 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,926 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,589 of 6,628 authors). This Tommy Felts is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Tommy Felts
Author details
Total words: 6,926
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.0% percentile 4.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 25.1% 25.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 21.2% 21.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 25.1%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Author 21.2%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst