Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video991 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Protests In Boulder results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 849 hits. Analysis detected 6,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,973 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,160 of 16,562 topics). This Local Protests In Boulder is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Local Protests In Boulder
Topic details
Total words: 2,973
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.0% percentile
7.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 28.6%28.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 27.2%27.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 13.5%13.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.6%17.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 16.6%16.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Topic 28.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 27.2%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos