BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 40.5% saturation with 401 hits. Analysis detected 2,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 991 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,360 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the article peer group.

Hundreds of protesters gathered in Boulder on Saturday in support of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), which the Trump administration has vowed to dismantle. 
The crowd  who were joined by elected officials like Rep. Joe Neguse and Sen. John Hickenlooper  gathered near the David Skaggs Research Center, which houses federal facilities and labs for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 
The area is more easily accessible than NCAR’s facility, a striking building perched on a mesa overlooking the city. 
“[NCAR] impacts our community and our economy, but it’s also made a huge impact on humanity since 1960,” said Christine Cowles, with Forever Indivisible Boulder, a local chapter of an advocacy group that organized the protest. 
“And we can't just not do something.” 
On Tuesday night, White House budget director Russ Vought posted on X that the Trump administration would break up the organization, calling it a hub of “climate alarmism,” and vowing to move some of its work to other locations. 
The administration’s decision provoked a furious response, partly because of how important the lab is to national and global weather research. 
The administration has also laid off dozens of employees at Boulder’s NOAA offices, and withheld or cancelled hundreds of millions of dollars in federal climate dollars destined for Colorado. 
“I think you're gonna see a very muscular response on our part, and on the part of many in Congress, who believe this to be one of the most dangerous and reckless decisions that Donald Trump has made in his 11 months in office,” said Neguse, a Democrat whose district includes Boulder. 
The center has pioneered major breakthroughs in climate and weather research. 
Those include devices to monitor hurricane conditions and a system to detect “wind shear” at airports, which can lead to plane crashes. 
Snow lightly fell on protesters Saturday, who waved signs saying “Save NCAR” and solicited more than a few supportive honks from drivers. 
The colder temperatures and calm skies were a far cry from the past few days, when more than 100 mph winds raced through Boulder County. 
The high fire danger led Xcel Energy to cut power for tens of thousands of customers; many are still without power. 
NCAR maintains widely used weather models used to track wind events like those. 
“It was also pretty ironic that as this whole windstorm was happening, everybody's checking the internet whenever we had connection to see the NCAR wind speed readings,” said Alden Perkins, who attended the protest. 
“That’s one thing that would go away if they manage to disestablish NCAR,” she said. 
Current and former elected officials vow to fight the move 
Some of Colorado’s elected officials vowed to fight the move. 
Colorado Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper are holding up a government spending package to try to ensure that NCAR gets its funding. 
Hickenlooper said they would slow down the appropriations bill “for as long as we can” to keep the center fully funded. 
“I talked to a dozen Republican senators on Thursday night,” Hickenlooper said. 
“And I think we’ll get the votes to have the Republicans say  the National Science Foundation should maintain the funding of NCAR.” 
The University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR), a nonprofit consortium of universities, manages NCAR on behalf of the federal National Science Foundation (NSF). 
In a statement, the National Science Foundation said it was reviewing NCAR’s structure and may try to move some work elsewhere. 
Rep. Neguse said he would send a likely bipartisan letter to congressional appropriators, to secure NCAR’s funding in congressional spending bills. 
He also said that House Democrats would be exploring legal challenges to stop the dismantling. 
“Suffice to say it’s going to be all-hands on deck,” he said. 
Neguse previously suggested the decision to close NCAR was retaliation for the plight of Tina Peters, a former Mesa County Clerk currently serving a nine-year state prison sentence for helping a man gain unauthorized access to Mesa County’s Dominion voting machines in 2021. 
President Trump issued a symbolic pardon for Peters last week, even though pardons are understood to apply only to federal crimes. 
Colorado has refused to release Peters. 
Aaron Brockett, Boulder’s mayor, said the NOAA layoffs, the shutdown, and a general loss of federal funding is starting to be felt in the city. 
“We’ve definitely been noticing an impact,” he said. 
“These are important well-paying jobs and folks who've been an important part of our community for a long time.” 
Cuts to science draw a crowd 
UCAR’s head, Antonio Busalacchi, told NPR News this week that the decision to scrap NCAR was political, while the center itself produces apolitical science. 
“We're very careful not to cross over that line to advocacy or policy prescription,” he told NPR News. 
Protesters in Boulder chanted in support of science, while also wondering why this center in particular was on the chopping block. 
The area around NCAR is home to popular hiking trails. 
“NCAR has such a special place in my heart,” said Annika Aumentado, a college student who grew up in Boulder. 
She said visiting NCAR was a recurring field-trip when she was in school. 
“They can't destroy NCAR  that's where we first gained a love of science,” she said. 
Kristopher Larsen, a planetary scientist at CU-Boulder and former mayor of Nederland, said so much of his colleagues’ work intersects with NCAR’s research, including his own NASA-funded projects. 
“NCAR does such fundamental research on the climate, on meteorology, on the atmosphere that everyone's work touches it,” he said. 
Steven Oncley worked at NCAR for his entire career, starting after his graduate degree. 
He focused on “micro-meterology,” a field which meant he studied fire weather, pollution, carbon dioxide research and more. 
His research, and that of his colleagues, helped refine hugely important weather models used throughout the world. 
“It’s horrible  it would be just a huge loss to the nation, to the world,” he said if NCAR was eliminated. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 2.5%Colorado Public Radio: 4.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Ishan Thakore: 5.2%Colorado Public Radio: 6.4%Availability Heuristic5.7%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Ishan Thakore: 2.7%Colorado Public Radio: 5.7%Confirmation Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 21.9%Ishan Thakore: 24.9%Colorado Public Radio: 26.7%Framing Effect21.9%This article: 4.3%Ishan Thakore: 0.7%Colorado Public Radio: 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error4.3%This article: 8.0%Ishan Thakore: 3.5%Colorado Public Radio: 5.0%Halo Effect8.0%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.3%Colorado Public Radio: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 40.5%Ishan Thakore: 10.5%Colorado Public Radio: 7.6%In-Group Bias40.5%This article: 19.0%Ishan Thakore: 11.8%Colorado Public Radio: 4.6%Loss Aversion19.0%This article: 17.8%Ishan Thakore: 28.5%Colorado Public Radio: 19.5%Negativity Bias17.8%This article: 4.4%Ishan Thakore: 5.6%Colorado Public Radio: 6.6%Optimism Bias4.4%This article: 8.3%Ishan Thakore: 1.7%Colorado Public Radio: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 1.7%Colorado Public Radio: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Ishan Thakore: 10.0%Colorado Public Radio: 4.6%Pessimism Bias5.3%This article: 1.3%Ishan Thakore: 0.4%Colorado Public Radio: 0.7%Primacy Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 1.7%Colorado Public Radio: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 1.8%Ishan Thakore: 1.2%Colorado Public Radio: 4.9%Self-Serving Bias1.8%This article: 6.3%Ishan Thakore: 2.2%Colorado Public Radio: 3.3%Status Quo Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.1%Colorado Public Radio: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.9%Ishan Thakore: 2.0%Colorado Public Radio: 1.7%Ad Hominem15.9%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 6.8%Ishan Thakore: 3.3%Colorado Public Radio: 3.9%Anecdotal6.8%This article: 16.2%Ishan Thakore: 13.2%Colorado Public Radio: 11.3%Appeal to Authority16.2%This article: 28.9%Ishan Thakore: 18.7%Colorado Public Radio: 13.0%Appeal to Emotion28.9%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.2%Colorado Public Radio: 0.5%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.2%Ishan Thakore: 1.7%Colorado Public Radio: 1.9%Bandwagon2.2%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.2%Colorado Public Radio: 0.3%Composition/Division2.0%This article: 0.7%Ishan Thakore: 1.3%Colorado Public Radio: 1.9%False Dilemma0.7%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.1%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.9%Ishan Thakore: 1.5%Colorado Public Radio: 1.0%Genetic Fallacy3.9%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 1.9%Colorado Public Radio: 3.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.6%Ishan Thakore: 0.3%Colorado Public Radio: 0.1%Personal Incredulity1.6%This article: 4.3%Ishan Thakore: 2.7%Colorado Public Radio: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.3%This article: 5.3%Ishan Thakore: 1.1%Colorado Public Radio: 0.7%Red Herring5.3%This article: 3.7%Ishan Thakore: 4.3%Colorado Public Radio: 2.5%Slippery Slope3.7%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.6%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ishan Thakore: 0.0%Colorado Public Radio: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%

991 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.