Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Center For Atmospheric Research (ncar) results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 1,151 hits . Analysis detected 10,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,326 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,468 of 37,536 keywords). This National Center For Atmospheric Research (ncar) is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. National Center For Atmospheric Research (ncar)
Keyword details
Total words: 4,326
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.1% percentile 6.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 24.2% 24.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 26.6% 26.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 24.2%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst