Topic summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Heritage results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Halo Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 260 hits . Analysis detected 1,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,803 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,354 of 16,562 topics). This Local Heritage is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Local Heritage
Topic details
Total words: 1,803
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.6% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.2%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst