Topic summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos3,302 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Economies results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 774 hits. Analysis detected 7,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,906 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,926 of 16,562 topics). This Local Economies is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Local Economies
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,906
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.7%6.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos