Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lng Market results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 358 hits. Analysis detected 2,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,913 of 16,562 topics). This Lng Market is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Lng Market
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,944
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.4%18.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 15.4%15.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.4%15.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos