Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Legislative Agenda results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 897 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,494 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Legislative Agenda is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Legislative Agenda
Topic details
Total words: 1,494
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos