Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Threats results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 770 hits. Analysis detected 4,427 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,456 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,737 of 16,562 topics). This Legal Threats is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Legal Threats
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,456
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.5%14.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 22.3%22.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos