Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Paraprofessionals results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 491 hits. Analysis detected 2,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,807 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 82% (3,062 of 16,562 topics). This Legal Paraprofessionals is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Legal Paraprofessionals
Topic details
Total words: 1,807
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 27.2%27.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.5%14.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 27.2%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos