Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ava Kian results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 27.2% saturation with 491 hits . Analysis detected 2,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,807 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 88% (845 of 6,628 authors). This Ava Kian is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Ava Kian
Author details
Total words: 1,807
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.3% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 27.2% 27.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.5% 14.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Self-Serving Bias: Author 27.2%, sitewide 3.7% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Circular Reasoning: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.1% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst