Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Battle results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 871 hits. Analysis detected 4,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,500 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,182 of 15,755 topics). This Legal Battle is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Legal Battle
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.8%15.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos