Topic summary
44%1 analyzed article/video1,362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lebanon Israel Relations results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 587 hits. Analysis detected 3,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,394 of 21,033 topics). This Lebanon Israel Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Lebanon Israel Relations
Topic details
Total words: 5,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos