Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lebanon Conflict results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,358 hits. Analysis detected 10,737 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,300 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,447 of 16,562 topics). This Lebanon Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos