Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lebanese Displacement results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 3,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,774 of 16,562 topics). This Lebanese Displacement is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Lebanese Displacement
Topic details
Total words: 4,392
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos