Topic summary
⁠74%4 analyzed articles/videos1,817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lawfare results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 3,024 hits. Analysis detected 19,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,294 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,189 of 15,447 topics). This Lawfare is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Lawfare
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,294
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 21.2%21.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.9%18.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.6%6.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos