Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,786 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Languages results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 1,393 hits. Analysis detected 8,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,005 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,139 of 16,562 topics). This Languages is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Languages
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,005
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles12K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.6%11.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos