Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,234 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sandrine Ceurstemont results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Overconfidence Bias , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,343 hits . Analysis detected 6,117 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,936 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (6,046 of 6,628 authors). This Sandrine Ceurstemont is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group. Sandrine Ceurstemont
Author details
Total words: 12,936
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.4% 10.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst