Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erika Benke results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,170 hits. Analysis detected 9,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,477 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (3,912 of 6,194 authors). This Erika Benke is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Erika Benke
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
37%Erika Benke (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,477
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

37% percentile
025507510036.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.6%1.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos