Topic summary
⁠56%2 analyzed articles/videos145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Language Policy results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 483 hits. Analysis detected 2,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,236 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,500 of 16,562 topics). This Language Policy is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group.
Language Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,236
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos