Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sophia Smith Galer results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 250 hits . Analysis detected 1,599 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Sophia Smith Galer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sophia Smith Galer
Author details
Total words: 3,656
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst