Topic summary
⁠11%2 analyzed articles/videos2,858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Land Conservation results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 866 hits. Analysis detected 5,960 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,707 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (15,003 of 16,494 topics). This Land Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Land Conservation
Topic details
Total words: 10,707
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751009.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos