Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video303 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lake Effect Snow results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 41.1% saturation with 374 hits. Analysis detected 1,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 909 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (398 of 16,562 topics). This Lake Effect Snow is worse (more manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Lake Effect Snow
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 909
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510097.6% percentile
16.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles909 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 41.1%41.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 21.0%21.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 14.7%14.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.4%20.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.6%8.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 41.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos