Topic summary
⁠87%2 analyzed articles/videos881 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Dispute results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 387 hits. Analysis detected 4,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,643 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,748 of 16,562 topics). This Labor Dispute is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Labor Dispute
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,643
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.6%14.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.6%6.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos