Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mead Gruver results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 288 hits . Analysis detected 2,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 91% (635 of 6,629 authors). This Mead Gruver is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Mead Gruver
Author details
Total words: 1,164
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.4% percentile 7.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 13.5% 13.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 12.3% 12.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 10.0% 10.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.4% 7.4% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.4% 5.4% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 24.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.9%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 13.5%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 10.0%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.8%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst