Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Busch results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 322 hits. Analysis detected 2,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (9,308 of 15,142 topics). This Kyle Busch is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Kyle Busch
Topic details
Total words: 3,592
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.6%Composition/Division: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate