Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These King Charles Iii results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,233 hits. Analysis detected 9,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,316 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,250 of 16,562 topics). This King Charles Iii is better (less manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
King Charles Iii
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.1% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos