Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karoline Leavitt results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,187 hits. Analysis detected 9,906 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,157 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,507 of 15,769 topics). This Karoline Leavitt is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Karoline Leavitt
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,157
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.7% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.6%16.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos