Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristine Parks results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 1,896 hits . Analysis detected 20,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,340 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,859 of 6,628 authors). This Kristine Parks is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Kristine Parks
Author details
Total words: 14,340
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.9% percentile 2.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.2% 13.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst