Fox News89%

New book on archaeological evidence for Jesus rockets to top of bestseller list 0%

By Kristine Parks0%

4/19/2026, 4:00:17 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 37.3% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 2,797 faulty-reasoning hits from 885 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

A new book on the historical evidence for Jesus has skyrocketed to the top of the bestseller charts as a prominent New Testament scholar argues that overwhelming archaeological finds verify the authenticity of the Bible and the resurrection. 
In "The Jesus Discoveries: 10 Historic Finds That Bring Us Face-to-Face with Jesus," author Dr. 
Jeremiah Johnston points to 10 major archaeological finds, including the controversial Shroud of Turin and the Dead Sea Scrolls, as historical artifacts that corroborate the biblical accounts. 
The book reached No. 2 on Amazon Charts' bestseller list in nonfiction last week, and reached No. 3 on the New York Times Bestsellers List this week. 
Johnston has shared his research on several popular podcasts recently, including the "Shawn Ryan Show," reaching over 1 million views. 
Johnston said he has spent the past four years traveling the world to consult with scientists and archaeologists who have studied these artifacts. 
He argues the findings provide compelling evidence for the New Testament, regardless of a person's religious background. 
ARCHAEOLOGISTS UNCOVER MYSTERIOUS CHRISTIAN ARTIFACT NEAR WATERS TIED TO JESUS' MINISTRY: 'NO KNOWN PARALLEL' 
"It turns out that we can learn 65 facts about the birth, the life, the ministry, the miracles and, of course, the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus... before we ever open the Bible. 
And no other religious figure on planet Earth has ever been this well evidenced," he told Fox News Digital. 
One discovery is the Shroud of Turin, a burial cloth some believe wrapped Jesus Christ, while others believe it is a 13th-century forgery. 
The shroud is unique compared to other burial cloths from the 1st century because it displays an image of a tortured, crucified man. 
"The fascinating thing about the shroud of Turin is it has an image of a brutalized, tormented, crucified man on the front and back that when you see it in the photo negative, you're actually seeing it in a photo positive and it takes your breath away," Johnston said. 
He said details on the cloth showing the man's injuries match the biblical narrative of how Jesus was killed. 
ARCHAEOLOGISTS UNCOVER JERUSALEM WALL MYSTERIOUSLY DESTROYED IN POWER STRUGGLE DURING BIBLICAL ERA 
"The red blood cells have broken down in the bilirubin because he's been tormented. 
It has high levels of ferritin and creatinine. 
And then you see that there is a wound on the left side, piercing through rib five and six," Johnston said. 
He noted the shroud shows piercings through the man's wrists and ankles, rather than through his palms and feet, as art from later centuries often depicts the crucifixion. 
He also says that pollen samples taken from the cloth are native to the Jerusalem area. 
He argues no one has been able to replicate the cloth's "mysterious properties, including its anatomical accuracy, lack of pigment and three-dimensional characteristics." 
"The image is only 0.2 microns thin. 
You realize that's one-fifth of the thickness of a piece of our hair?" 
Johnston said. 
"That's how superficial the image on the shroud is." 
Johnston spoke to Italian physicist Paolo di Lazzaro, a senior researcher at the ENEA Research Center in Rome, who spent five years trying to recreate the image. 
Lazzaro's testing found it would take "a burst of 34,000 billion watts of radiant energy delivered in one-40 billionth of a second to create the image," according to Johnston. 
LOOTERS' ARREST UNCOVERS 2,000-YEAR-OLD WORKSHOP NEAR JERUSALEM BIBLICAL PILGRIMAGE PATH 
Johnston believes the findings suggest a supernatural event created it. 
"That's why I say the Shroud of Turin is not a death cloth; it is a resurrection cloth. 
That is the moment when Jesus' physical body came back to life," he claimed. 
The shroud has only been carbon-dated once, in 1988, returning a date of 1260-1390 AD. 
Johnston said recent peer-reviewed studies have "discredited" that dating, arguing the sample was a contaminated area that had been patched. 
He said newer technologies using Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering (WAXS) have "confirmed a 1st century date." 
ARCHAEOLOGISTS UNEARTH 1,600-YEAR-OLD CHRISTIAN MONASTIC SITE WITH PAINTINGS, MYSTERIOUS INSCRIPTION 
He points to other evidence suggesting the shroud is older than the radiocarbon date, such as a similar image of Jesus on the front of a seventh-century solidus from Emperor Justinian II. 
The shroud is just one discovery Johnston discusses in the book. 
He also details an artifact dubbed the "Jesus Cup," which is dated to 50 AD. 
The cup is inscribed in Greek with a phrase describing Jesus as an enchanter or magician, which Johnston says shows Jesus' reputation as a healer was well known throughout the Roman Empire. 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE 
Other artifacts in the book include the James Ossuary, the Magdalen Papyrus, and finds confirming the existence of Pontius Pilate. 
Johnston said he wanted to help Christians and nonbelievers see historical evidence for Christianity. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
"Not a shred of the New Testament would have been written" if Jesus' apostles had not had an evidence-based belief that they saw him alive after he died, he said. 
"We should be skeptical of anything we commit our lives to," he said. 
"The beautiful thing is, the deeper you go with your questions into Christianity, the more rock-solid our faith becomes." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 37.3%Kristine Parks: 13.2%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias37.3%This article: 3.4%Kristine Parks: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias3.4%This article: 11.4%Kristine Parks: 3.2%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic11.4%This article: 5.8%Kristine Parks: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Kristine Parks: 6.2%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias15.7%This article: 7.0%Kristine Parks: 12.6%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Kristine Parks: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias2.1%This article: 1.1%Kristine Parks: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.1%This article: 8.2%Kristine Parks: 8.8%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias8.2%This article: 2.1%Kristine Parks: 4.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias2.1%This article: 3.4%Kristine Parks: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error3.4%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Kristine Parks: 4.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 2.8%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Kristine Parks: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect4.5%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.3%Kristine Parks: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias11.3%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 4.3%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.9%Kristine Parks: 7.4%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority20.9%This article: 9.9%Kristine Parks: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma9.9%This article: 1.1%Kristine Parks: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope1.1%This article: 2.1%Kristine Parks: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning2.1%This article: 28.6%Kristine Parks: 9.2%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization28.6%This article: 3.2%Kristine Parks: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring3.2%This article: 6.8%Kristine Parks: 1.3%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon6.8%This article: 18.6%Kristine Parks: 11.7%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion18.6%This article: 11.0%Kristine Parks: 2.8%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question11.0%This article: 3.2%Kristine Parks: 2.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.2%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.9%Kristine Parks: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.9%This article: 3.7%Kristine Parks: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature3.7%This article: 3.6%Kristine Parks: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division3.6%This article: 11.4%Kristine Parks: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal11.4%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.1%Kristine Parks: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.1%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 2.3%Kristine Parks: 1.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy2.3%This article: 24.3%Kristine Parks: 3.8%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote24.3%This article: 5.4%Kristine Parks: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection5.4%This article: 11.3%Kristine Parks: 3.8%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice11.3%This article: 8.2%Kristine Parks: 3.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination8.2%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 3.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 18.2%Kristine Parks: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…18.2%

885 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers72%attributed speech248writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 20 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 34 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 49 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 14 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 8 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 16 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 7 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 13 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 2 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 27 words • 100.0% coveragePaolo di Lazzaro • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 10 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 20 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 15 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 30 words • 0.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 13 words • 100.0% coverageJeremiah Johnston • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jeremiah Johnston

98%flagged-word coverage
608 attributed words95% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -53.6 ptsWriter: 56.9%Jeremiah Johnston: 3.3%3.3%Unattributed Quote+30.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jeremiah Johnston: 30.6%30.6%Biased Writer Voice-5.1 ptsWriter: 15.3%Jeremiah Johnston: 10.2%10.2%Indoctrination+12.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jeremiah Johnston: 12.0%12.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.1 ptsWriter: 5.6%Jeremiah Johnston: 5.6%5.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.