Fox News89%

'Ant-Man' actress slams Disney for 'disgusting' Marvel layoffs 83%

By Kristine Parks0%

4/30/2026, 11:00:18 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 183 hits. Analysis detected 1,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 581 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 74.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (3,751 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the article peer group.

"Avengers" actress Evangeline Lilly rebuked Disney over layoffs affecting Marvel employees in its visual development department, calling the move "disgusting and horrible" in a video posted to Instagram Thursday. 
Lilly, who portrayed Hope van Dyne, also known as The Wasp, in four Marvel films, said she learned about the layoffs from friend Andy Park, a longtime Marvel visual development artist who helped create early Wasp suit concepts. 
"I reached out to my good friend Andy Park, who was the genius behind creating the original Wasp supersuit and the original Wasp concept drawings for the film ‘Ant-Man and the Wasp,’ and just said, ‘Is this true? 
Is this really what’s happening?’" 
Lilly recalled. 
"And he said, ‘Yeah, it’s true. 
I have been let go.’ 
"I can’t quite believe that," Lilly continued. 
"That Disney have let go of the artists who brought the current Marvel Universe to life through their imagination and their genius. 
SCARLETT JOHANSSON WARNS OF AI DANGERS, SAYS 'THERE'S NO BOUNDARY HERE' 
"That the people who invented these characters in the first place, who designed them in the first place, are now being replaced by AI. 
AI that will take their designs and take what those artists created and use it to create iterations of that." 
Lilly also expressed sympathy for the broader group of Disney employees swept up in the cuts and especially for Marvel artists she said had become "obsolete" after helping build the franchise. 
"These were human creations, and they shouldn’t be stolen by tech giants so that their robots can replicate them," Lilly added. 
"I think it’s disgusting and horrible, and I stand with all the artists and Andy." 
In the caption accompanying her video, she tagged Disney, writing "SHAME ON YOU" and urged California lawmakers to act. 
"Where are the laws that REMOVE all human art from the AI bank?!? 
Why do they get to steal our brilliance and use it to make executives rich while the artists responsible for feeding their robots go hungry?? 
Disgusting. 
California lawmakers...where are you?!?!" 
she wrote. 
EVANGELINE LILLY CONFIRMS SHE SUSTAINED BRAIN DAMAGE FROM TRAUMATIC INJURY LAST YEAR 
Disney confirmed earlier this month it would be laying off 1,000 employees across the company. 
In a memo obtained by Fox News Digital, CEO Josh D’Amaro said the company had been reviewing ways to streamline operations and "foster a more agile and technologically-enabled workforce." 
"Over the past several months, we have looked at ways in which we can streamline our operations in various parts of the company to ensure we deliver the world-class creativity and innovation our fans value and expect from Disney," D’Amaro wrote. 
"Given the fast-moving pace of our industries, this requires us to constantly assess how to foster a more agile and technologically-enabled workforce to meet tomorrow’s needs." 
Disney’s statement does not explicitly say the layoffs were driven by AI, and the company did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Lilly’s allegation that artists were being replaced by artificial intelligence. 
FCC TO CALL IN DISNEY STATIONS FOR EARLY LICENSE REVIEW IN WAKE OF ABC'S JIMMY KIMMEL CONTROVERSY 
Initial reports indicated that 8% of Marvel's workforce was cut, though Disney later disputed that number, telling The Wrap the number was "much smaller." 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE 
Disney did not immediately return Fox News Digital's request for comment. 
Fox News' Lindsay Kornick contributed to this report. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.7%Kristine Parks: 13.2%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 3.2%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 6.2%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Kristine Parks: 12.6%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.5%Kristine Parks: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias4.5%This article: 7.6%Kristine Parks: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias7.6%This article: 31.5%Kristine Parks: 8.8%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias31.5%This article: 7.1%Kristine Parks: 4.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Kristine Parks: 4.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 2.8%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Kristine Parks: 2.1%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Kristine Parks: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Kristine Parks: 4.3%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem4.3%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.1%Kristine Parks: 7.4%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority7.1%This article: 10.0%Kristine Parks: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma10.0%This article: 3.4%Kristine Parks: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope3.4%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.3%Kristine Parks: 9.2%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization13.3%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.6%Kristine Parks: 1.3%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon2.6%This article: 22.9%Kristine Parks: 11.7%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion22.9%This article: 6.4%Kristine Parks: 2.8%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question6.4%This article: 6.4%Kristine Parks: 2.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.4%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 11.9%Kristine Parks: 1.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof11.9%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.8%Kristine Parks: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division3.8%This article: 7.4%Kristine Parks: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal7.4%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.6%Kristine Parks: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.6%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 1.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.0%Kristine Parks: 3.8%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote1.0%This article: 6.9%Kristine Parks: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection6.9%This article: 1.4%Kristine Parks: 3.8%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice1.4%This article: 7.6%Kristine Parks: 3.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination7.6%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristine Parks: 3.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Kristine Parks: 2.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.9%

581 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers66%attributed speech199writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 38 words • 0.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 38 words • 0.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageAndy Park • 6 words • 100.0% coverageAndy Park • 5 words • 0.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 7 words • 0.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 24 words • 0.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 21 words • 100.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 15 words • 0.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 19 words • 100.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 13 words • 0.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 25 words • 0.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 1 words • 0.0% coverageEvangeline Lilly • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDisney • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJosh D’Amaro • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJosh D’Amaro • 41 words • 0.0% coverageJosh D’Amaro • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageFox News • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Evangeline Lilly

83%flagged-word coverage
252 attributed words66% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Quote-first Misdirection-20.1 ptsWriter: 20.1%Evangeline Lilly: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+17.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Evangeline Lilly: 17.5%17.5%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%Evangeline Lilly: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.0 ptsWriter: 4.0%Evangeline Lilly: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.