Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Royals results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 2,078 hits . Analysis detected 15,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,632 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (13,171 of 15,338 topics). This Kansas City Royals is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group. Kansas City Royals
Topic details
Total words: 19,632
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst