Topic summary
ā 82%1 analyzed article/video1,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juvenile Justice System results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 543 hits. Analysis detected 4,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,933 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ā 57% (7,173 of 16,562 topics). This Juvenile Justice System is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Juvenile Justice System
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 57%Juvenile Justice System (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,933
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos