Author summary
ā 84% 1 analyzed article/video 1,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Hagan results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 543 hits . Analysis detected 4,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,933 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ā 66% (2,289 of 6,628 authors). This Andrea Hagan is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Andrea Hagan
Author details
Total words: 3,933
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.8% 5.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.8% 3.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst