Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jumaane Williams results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Actor-Observer Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 520 hits. Analysis detected 3,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,287 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,611 of 15,266 topics). This Jumaane Williams is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Jumaane Williams
Topic details
Total words: 1,287
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.5% percentile
8.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 27.0%27.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 31.8%31.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 40.4%40.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.8%20.8%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 8.7%8.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 11.2%11.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 8.2%8.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 40.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 31.8%, sitewide 15.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Middle Ground: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.1%Red Herring: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Special Pleading: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos